vendredi 14 juin 2013

HUSSEIN OBAMA FORBIDS SNOOPING IN MOSQUES !

Obama Restricts Spying In Mosques While Spying Everywhere Else

When Obama, on video, said he was opposed to spying on “innocent Americans” he was referring specifically to spying on Muslims and when he said he’d provide tools to catch terrorists he was referring to Americans who oppose him. 


 The White House assures that tracking our every phone call and keystroke is to stop terrorists, and yet it won’t snoop in mosques, where the terrorists are.

That’s right, the government’s sweeping surveillance of our most private communications excludes the jihad factories where homegrown terrorists are radicalized.

Since October 2011, mosques have been off-limits to FBI agents. No more surveillance or undercover string operations without high-level approval from a special oversight body at the Justice Department dubbed the Sensitive Operations Review Committee.
Who makes up this body, and how do they decide requests? Nobody knows; the names of the chairman, members and staff are kept secret.

We do know the panel was set up under pressure from Islamist groups who complained about FBI stings at mosques. Just months before the panel’s formation, the Council on American-Islamic Relations teamed up with the ACLU to sue the FBI for allegedly violating the civil rights of Muslims in Los Angeles by hiring an undercover agent to infiltrate and monitor mosques there.

Before mosques were excluded from the otherwise wide domestic spy net the administration has cast, the FBI launched dozens of successful sting operations against homegrown jihadists — inside mosques — and disrupted dozens of plots against the homeland.
The stings only stop FBI supervised plots. They don’t stop Ft. Hood or the Arkansas jihad and aren’t likely to stop future acts of jihad Muslims will wage on Americans.

As Diana West writes in No Constitution, no borders, no USA:

If our leaders really wanted to prevent “another 9/11,” they would have long ago admitted the obvious: that the world of Islam, from its terrorists to its kings, is engaged in the latest historical cycle of jihad to extend the reach of Islamic law (Shariah). They would have decided that “profiling” isn’t worse than terrorism.

 They would have halted Islamic immigration not only to stop more jihad cells from forming but also to prevent Constitution-endangering, pro-Shariah demographics from forming, too. They would have sharply curtailed travel, and particularly return travel from jihad nations such as Chechnya and Pakistan. 

They would have long ago blocked U.S. institutions, including colleges, media organizations and banks, from accepting millions of dollars from Shariah-ruled dictatorships. They would have closed down mosques in America where jihad is preached and supported.

Above all, they would have secured our borders rather than leave them open all these post-9/11 years.

 Of course, that would mean re-establishing and defending those borders, both literally and figuratively.

That’s one thing Washington, D.C., will never tolerate.

Spying on Americans, that’s an all too tolerable story in DC.
ùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùù

Aucun commentaire: