LES MUZZ N'AIMENT PAS LES CHIENS (MEME LES CHIENS D'AVEUGLES...)
Muslim taxi driver penalised for refusing to carry disabled woman’s assistance dog
Posted: Wed, 30 Oct 2013
A Muslim taxi driver in East Sussex has been given 12
penalty points after he refused to carry a disabled woman in his cab
because she had an assistance dog with her.
He claimed it was because of religious objections to the dog that he told the woman to find another taxi.
However, anti-discrimination legislation clearly states that taxi drivers cannot discriminate on grounds of disability.
The
driver contacted his local imam for advice and was told that he should
have taken the woman and her dog and then atoned for the religious
breach later.
Wealden District Council's licensing
sub-committee discussed the matter on 2 October, and considered whether
the driver was still considered a fit and proper person to hold a taxi
licence.
The committee decided that the driver, who
was not identified, had sought religious direction on the matter, and
that he was now fully aware of his duties as a licensed driver and that
he should not lose his job as a result of the incident.
Dave
Stitchman, owner of East Grinstead's King of the Road Cars taxi firm,
said he would have respected the driver's religious beliefs. He told the
local newspaper: "I have not ever had a Muslim driver at the firm but
we once had a Turkish man who just didn't turn up on his first day.
Personally I would have tried to resolve the situation quickly to help
both the taxi driver and the client.
"I'm not too
sure what the rules of Ramadan are so I would have a quick look on the
internet and tell the driver what he can and can't do. I would explain
the situation to the client and be honest and up front about the reason
why the driver feels the way he does."
Terry
Sanderson, President of the National Secular Society, said: "There seems
to be some confusion here about what the law permits. The Equalities
legislation makes it quite clear that services cannot be refused on the
grounds of disability and this taxi driver was clearly in the wrong
trying to put his religion before the law.
"Mr
Stitchman seems to think that it would have been OK to put the driver's
beliefs above the needs of his customer.
It is not. Leaving a disabled
person potentially high and dry like this simply cannot be countenanced.
Suppose there had been no other taxis, what then?"
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire