lundi 23 avril 2012

antisharia.com



Posted: 20 Apr 2012 

Masoud Gadir, Muslim chaplain at University of East Anglia and president of Norwich and Norfolk Muslim Association, said: “When you look at the leaflet it brings in hatred and scaremongers as to what Islam is.

“God has given us the mind and brain to think – not to follow any religion blindly.”
Yes, God has given us a brain to think and “not follow any religion blindly.” God has also given us free-will to make a conscience and genuine choice if we want to stay in that religion or not for the rest of our days. What does Islam say to the Muslim who dears to think outside of the Islamic box and begins to question what was taught to them since early childhood? I think we know the answer to that one, don’t we?

Bukhari: Book 84: No.57 – ‘Do not punish anybody with Allah’s punishment (fire).’ I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah’s Apostle, ‘Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.’”
BBC News – A church has been banned from holding a weekly bookstall in Norwich following a complaint it was producing “hate-motivated” literature against Islam.
The Norwich Reformed Church held the stall on the city’s Hay Hill, which is owned by Norwich City Council.
The council has stopped the church using the site for equality reasons.
Pastor Alan Clifford said the church would appeal in the hope “the council will see sense and see how they are violating our freedom of speech”.
Mr Clifford wrote the leaflet, Why Not Islam, about 10 years ago. The church has been distributing the literature from Hay Hill since 2008.
‘High and mighty’
He said: “Our first response was one of surprise.
“We felt this a violation of freedom of speech and I was accused of hate motivation in producing this leaflet.
“It’s an intolerance from the city council acting in a high and mighty manner as we’ve had it confirmed by Norfolk Police – who’ve inspected the document – there is no crime involved.”
Masoud Gadir, Muslim chaplain at University of East Anglia and president of Norwich and Norfolk Muslim Association, said: “When you look at the leaflet it brings in hatred and scaremongers as to what Islam is.
“God has given us the mind and brain to think – not to follow any religion blindly.”
The Norwich Reformed Church, associated with the Farthing Trust, received notice from the council on 5 April that it would no longer be able to do outreach work on Hay Hill.
The authority has also advised the council-owned Eaton Park Community Centre not to take any further bookings from the church, which has used the centre as a place of worship since 1994.
A council spokesman said: “We received a complaint from a member of the public about material published by the Norwich Reformed Church which uses council facilities.
“This was considered to be hate motivated.”
The spokesman added that the police advised that no criminal offence had been committed, but the council had a “duty to foster good relations between people of all backgrounds and religions”.
The Farthing Trust is appealing against what it describes as the city council’s “dramatic action”.
(Article)


Posted: 20 Apr 2012 10:17 AM PDT

“Al Qaeda warned Britain that his expulsion would open ‘the gates of evil that will harm (Britain) and its subjects.’”
So they admit they are being “evil”?
Should we take it then that if Abu Qatada is not deported back to Jordan the jihadists will not launch a wave of terrorists attacks on Britain?
Daily Mail – Militants have threatened to plunge Britain into ‘disaster’ with a wave of terror attacks if hate cleric Abu Qatada is deported to Jordan.
In a statement posted to a militant web forum, Al Qaeda warned Britain that his expulsion would open ‘the gates of evil that will harm (Britain) and its subjects.’
SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors online activity from terrorist groups, said that Somalia’s al-Qaeda-linked militant group al-Shabab also issued a warning on militant forums Monday.
‘The British public is also forewarned that it will be the British government, as a result of its imprudence, that shall be liable for any disaster that befalls them, or their national interests,’ the statement said, according to SITE.
Yesterday it emerged that Qatada could be back on the streets within weeks as the row over botched efforts to deport him continued to rage.
An immigration judge said he would reconsider bail if the fanatic’s removal from Britain was not ‘imminent’.
The ruling was a further blow to embattled Home Secretary Theresa May as she continued to insist there had been no blunder by her officials over Qatada’s case.
Facing down her critics in the Commons, Mrs May accepted she would take ‘full responsibility’ for any mistakes. She said: ‘This is not a question of what officials have done. I take full responsibility.
Backbench Tory MPs demanded Britain’s withdrawal from the European Court of Human Rights.
In an exchange with Mrs May yesterday, Tory MP Charles Walker said: ‘You must not delay in getting this scumbag and his murderous mates on a plane out of this country. And in so doing would you send a metaphorical two fingers to the ECHR?’
Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper taunted Mrs May for ‘partying with X Factor judges’ while the Government’s case collapsed after she was pictured at a glitzy celebrity party attended by Tulisa Contostavlos, as well as Kelly Brook and Lorraine Kelly
Miss Cooper also warned the ‘farce had serious consequences’ and raised the prospect of Qatada suing the Government for wrongful arrest.
Legal experts appeared to side against Mrs May’s assertion that the true deadline for Qatada’s lawyers to lodge an appeal in the case to Strasbourg was Monday night.
On Tuesday Mrs May ordered his arrest and told the Commons the time period for a further legal claim had passed. But Strasbourg officials last night repeated their belief that the true deadline was midnight on Tuesday night and the case was lodged ‘just in time’.
David Cameron exposed his own powerlessness over the affair, saying: ‘I sometimes wish I could put him on a plane and take him to Jordan myself.’
The prospect of the radical cleric walking the streets again only a short time after he was put back in Belmarsh high-security prison will horrify the public.
After his arrest on Tuesday he appeared before the Special Immigration Appeals Commission, a special terror court, and was remanded to the jail.
But in a ruling released yesterday, judge Mr Justice Mitting said: ‘If it is obvious after two or three weeks have elapsed that deportation is not imminent… then I will reconsider bail along the basis of a more leisurely timetable than that necessarily required for a full-blown appeal to SIAC.’
Justice Secretary Ken Clarke said he could not see what the ‘big deal was’ over the apparent blunder.
Called to the Commons to explain the affair, Mrs May said: ‘The Government is clear that Qatada has no right to refer the case to the Grand Chamber of the ECHR since the three-month deadline to do so lapsed at midnight on Monday.’
She was given strong support from the Tory backbenches, but MPs also insisted she should defy the European Court of Human Rights anyway.
Tory Mark Spencer said the saga risked painting the UK as a ‘safe haven’ for terrorists, while Sir Peter Tapsell said it was time the UK ‘withdrew its legal processes’ from the European Court.
Bill Cash, chairman of the European Scrutiny Committee, said: ‘You have tried your best, there is no question about that. But unfortunately it is not working.
‘The root cause of this is the question of what is the rule of law, whose rule of law and who interprets it?
‘It should be decided in this House. We should withdraw from the European Convention, we should repeal the Human Rights Act and we should get the matter straight because the people of this country demand it.’
Labour seized on comments from an ECHR spokesman which confirmed its view that the deadline was Tuesday.
A panel of five judges of the court will make a final ruling on admissibility, but that could be several months away.



WHAT A DIFFERENCE A DAY MAKES FOR MAY
What a difference a day makes. On Tuesday Theresa May was cheered in the Commons after ordering the arrest of fanatic Abu Qatada.
His removal from the country appeared, if not imminent, then at least on the near horizon.
But by Wednesday the Home Office timetable was in ruins after his legal team launched a further appeal to the Strasbourg court.
Mrs May, and her team of highly paid lawyers and silks, are insistent that the deadline for an appeal passed on Monday night and the appeal, submitted at 11pm on Tuesday, was late and should be rejected.
Court officials appeared to side with Qatada’s lawyers, and a final ruling on the issue will be made by a panel of Strasbourg judges. So who is right – and were the Government’s legal team, as Keith Vaz put it, outwitted by a firm of North London legal aid lawyers?
At first glance, the European Convention on Human Rights seems unambiguous, and backs up Mrs May’s case.
Article 43 states: ‘Within a period of three months from the date of the judgment of the Chamber, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber.’
So if a written appeal has not been received within that time, the original judgment becomes final.
So far so straightforward? Sadly no.
The question that remains is when does the clock start ticking? Is it, as the Government maintains, on the day the judgment is handed down, or is it the following day?
Mrs May must now wait anxiously for the final decision to be made by a panel of the court, and that could be months away, further delaying efforts to kick out Qatada and bolstering his case for bail.
(Article)

Aucun commentaire: